Difference between revisions of "Introduction/Landing/Malocclusion Rethought"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<div style="margin-top:16px;" class="plainlinks"> | <div style="margin-top:16px;" class="plainlinks"> | ||
<Center> | |||
<p class="center" style="margin:18px 0;"> | <p class="center" style="margin:18px 0;"> | ||
<span class="colour-button">[https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd8SDy_Z-TAPscNufK2JIHyCN9AuSbbadLc2tioWfzDbDV-OQ/viewform?usp=sf_link Member Communication Hub ]</span> | |||
</p> | </p> | ||
</Center> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<!-- SECTION --> | <!-- SECTION --> | ||
Revision as of 19:02, 19 September 2025
Malocclusion Rethought
From “Malocclusion” to a broader paradigm: Occlusal Dysmorphisms.
Malocclusion Rethought
"Malocclusion" (from Latin malum = bad) traditionally labels an improper “closure” of teeth. Yet modern clinical science shows that function cannot be reduced to mechanics alone. Electrophysiological findings (e.g., symmetry in motor-evoked potentials, jaw-jerk, and silent period) often reveal balanced trigeminal dynamics even in the presence of occlusal discrepancies.
This challenges the conventional label “malocclusion” and supports a broader concept: Occlusal Dysmorphisms. Within a complex-systems view of mastication, neuromuscular coherence can coexist with occlusal asymmetries, urging interdisciplinary diagnostics that integrate occlusion with neurophysiology to achieve stable outcomes and reduce relapses.
Fig. 1a: Open bite and crossbite case (occlusal view).
Fig. 1b: Bilateral MEP symmetry in masseter muscles.
Fig. 1c: Jaw-jerk reflex indicating functional symmetry.
Fig. 1d: Mechanical silent period (balanced neuromuscular dynamics).
📑 References
- Interdisciplinary diagnostics of malocclusions — Smaglyuk et al., 2019
- Anterior open bite review — Reichert et al., 2014
- Early crossbite protocols — Miamoto et al., 2018
Malocclusion Rethought
Masticationpedia — open scientific platform for dentistry and medicine.