Epistemology in Dentistry — Evidence, Logic, Uncertainty

< Introduction
Revision as of 09:38, 19 September 2025 by Gianni (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ {{DISPLAYTITLE: Epistemology in Dentistry — Evidence, Logic, Uncertainty}} <!-- HERO --> <div style="background:#f2f7ff; border-radius:14px; padding:28px; text-align:center; margin-bottom:22px; border:1px solid #e9eef7;"> <h1 style="margin:.2rem 0; font-size:2.2rem; line-height:1.2;">Epistemology in Dentistry</h1> <p style="font-size:1.08rem; opacity:.85; margin:.5rem 0 1.2rem;"> How science advances: verification, paradigm shifts and statistical nua...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Go to top


Epistemology in Dentistry

How science advances: verification, paradigm shifts and statistical nuance.

Epistemology

Epistemology studies the foundations, validity and limits of scientific knowledge. From Hume’s problem of verification to Kuhn’s paradigm shifts, science is not a straight line but a sequence of normal phases and crises that reshape what we accept as “true”.

In clinical research, the debate around statistical significance (e.g., campaigns to move beyond a rigid p < 0.05) invites nuanced inference: confidence intervals, Bayesian approaches, and transparent design reduce false positives and sharpen conclusions. Dentistry benefits when evidence is framed within these modern epistemic tools, avoiding binary thinking and embracing uncertainty as a path to better decisions.

The black swan question: do white swans imply all swans are white?
Black Swan (Cygnus atratus) RWD.jpg
Duck-Rabbit illusion.jpg
Kuhn’s optical illusion: same data, different paradigm.

📑 References

 Masticationpedia — open scientific platform for dentistry and medicine.