Malocclusion Rethought — Occlusal Dysmorphisms
Go to top
Malocclusion Rethought
From “bad bite” to a broader paradigm: Occlusal Dysmorphisms
In 30 seconds: many “malocclusions” show functional symmetry at neurophysiological tests (MEP, jaw-jerk). Purely occlusal targets risk relapse if neuromuscular factors are ignored. An interdisciplinary model improves long-term stability.
Why this matters
- Electrophysiology can reveal balanced trigeminal dynamics even with occlusal issues.
- A mechanical-only view may miss neural drivers of orofacial dysfunction.
- Integrating occlusion + neurophysiology reduces relapses and improves outcomes.
What you’ll learn
- How complexity science reframes occlusal stability.
- When “malocclusion” is an insufficient label.
- The clinical role of Occlusal Dysmorphisms in rehabilitation.
A paradigm shift: the same data can be seen in a new way.
Evidence & further reading
- Epistemology and paradigm shifts (Kuhn)
- Complex systems and emergent behavior
- Dental Malocclusion (classical view)
Quick FAQ
- Is this against orthodontics?
- No. It enriches traditional rehab with neuro-physiology and complexity.
- Why “Occlusal Dysmorphisms”?
- Because function may be preserved despite occlusal discrepancies; the label highlights a wider diagnostic frame.
Masticationpedia — open scientific platform for dentistry and medicine.