Introduction/Landing/Malocclusion Rethought

< Introduction
Revision as of 08:50, 19 September 2025 by Gianni (talk | contribs)
Go to top

Malocclusion Rethought

From "bad bite" to a broader paradigm: Occlusal Dysmorphisms

In brief: many so-called "malocclusions" show functional symmetry at neurophysiological tests (MEP, jaw-jerk). Purely occlusal targets risk relapse if neuromuscular factors are ignored. An interdisciplinary model improves long-term stability.

Why this matters

  • Electrophysiology can reveal balanced trigeminal dynamics even with occlusal issues.
  • A mechanistic-only view may miss neural drivers of orofacial dysfunction.
  • Integrating occlusion + neurophysiology reduces relapses and improves outcomes.

What you’ll learn

  • How complexity science reframes occlusal stability.
  • Why “malocclusion” is often an insufficient label.
  • The clinical role of Occlusal Dysmorphisms in rehabilitation.

Evidence & further reading