Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors
17,894
edits
Difference between revisions of "Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system - en"
Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system - en (view source)
Revision as of 23:16, 28 October 2022
, 2 years ago→A coherent language
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 210: | Line 210: | ||
* '''Interdisciplinarity''' | * '''Interdisciplinarity''' | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
The proposed alternative philosophical paradigm, called the "Engineering Paradigm of Science" implies alternative philosophical assumptions regarding aspects such as the purpose of science, the character of knowledge, the epistemic and pragmatic criteria for the acceptance of knowledge and the role of technological tools. Consequently, scientific researchers need so-called metacognitive scaffolds to aid in the analysis and reconstruction of how "knowledge" is constructed in different disciplines. <ref>Boon M | The proposed alternative philosophical paradigm, called the "Engineering Paradigm of Science" implies alternative philosophical assumptions regarding aspects such as the purpose of science, the character of knowledge, the epistemic and pragmatic criteria for the acceptance of knowledge and the role of technological tools. Consequently, scientific researchers need so-called metacognitive scaffolds to aid in the analysis and reconstruction of how "knowledge" is constructed in different disciplines. <ref name=boonvan>{{cita libro | ||
| autore = Boon M | |||
| autore2 = Van Baalen S | |||
| titolo = Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science | |||
| url = https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383598/pdf/13194_2018_Article_242.pdf | |||
| volume = Topical Collection: EPSA17: Selected papers from the biannual conference in Exeter | |||
| opera = Eur J Philos Sci | |||
| anno = 2019 | |||
| editore = Springer | |||
| città = | |||
| ISBN = | |||
| DOI = 10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4 | |||
| PMID = 30873248 | |||
| PMCID = PMC6383598 | |||
| oaf = yes<!-- qualsiasi valore --> | |||
| LCCN = | |||
| OCLC = | |||
}}</ref><ref>Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017.<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small> </ref> Precisely these 'Metacognitive Scaffolds' have allowed us to consider an important requirement in diagnostics that of 'basic knowledge' which tends to reduce the vagueness and ambiguity of the logic of medical language.<ref>Codish S, Shiffman RN, «'''A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations'''», in [[:Category:Citations from AMIA Annu Symp Proc|AMIA Annu Symp Proc]], 2005.<small>PMID:16779019</small></ref> | |||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
* '''Logic of medical language''' | * '''Logic of medical language''' | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
These premises <ref | These premises<ref name=boonvan /><ref>Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small></ref> led us to the description of 'Fuzzy logic' models in which the 'Basic knowledge' is stratified at multiple levels of the context in multiple disciplines, increasing its capacity in differential diagnosis. All this is '''Logic of medical language'''<nowiki/>' with which we followed the diagnostic process of our poor patient 'Mary Poppins' who for 10 years hoped to be made a certain diagnosis despite the various attempts of clinical scientific propositions in the dental and neurological context: | ||
'''Propositions in the Dental Context''' | '''Propositions in the Dental Context''' | ||