Malocclusion Rethought — Occlusal Dysmorphisms

< Introduction
Revision as of 19:24, 19 September 2025 by Gianni (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Go to top


Malocclusion Rethought

From “Malocclusion” to a broader paradigm: Occlusal Dysmorphisms.

 
   👉 Read the full chapter
 


Malocclusion Rethought

The term "Malocclusion," derived from the Latin malum ("bad"), was first introduced by Edward Angle to define an improper “closure” of teeth.[1] Yet, the notion of "bad closure" remains ambiguous in medical contexts.

A PubMed search for "Malocclusion" yields over 33,000 articles,[2] but without clear consensus on its definition. Smaglyuk et al. stress the importance of an interdisciplinary approach in diagnostics,[3] yet a query for "interdisciplinary diagnostics of malocclusions" returns only four articles,[4] underscoring a major gap in the literature. This suggests a paradigmatic shift may be underway, as described in Kuhn’s phase 4 model.

«Diagnosis, treatment strategies, and prevention of anomalies and dento-facial deformities should consider the organism as a whole, particularly in children whose structures are still developing.»

A clinical case illustrates this complexity: a patient presented with a unilateral posterior crossbite and anterior open bite. Literature suggests orthodontic appliances and sometimes orthognathic surgery are indicated.[5] Crossbite correction is equally important due to its functional link with open bite.[6] In this case, however, the patient refused treatment, claiming function was unaffected.

Electrophysiological testing revealed functional symmetry in the masticatory system despite occlusal discrepancies. Findings included:

These results challenge the reductionist view of malocclusion, showing that **neuromuscular balance may coexist with occlusal asymmetries**. Hence, diagnostic strategies must integrate occlusion with neurophysiology to avoid oversimplification.

Occlusal Dysmorphisms, not simply Malocclusion — an entirely different paradigm.

Bibliography & references
  1. Attributed to Edward Angle, the father of modern orthodontics.
  2. Pubmed, Malocclusion
  3. Smaglyuk LV, Voronkova HV, Karasiunok AY, Liakhovska AV, Solovei KO, «Interdisciplinary approach to diagnostics of malocclusions (review)», in Wiad Lek, 2019».  72(5 cz 1):918-922.
  4. Pubmed, Interdisciplinary diagnostics of malocclusions
  5. Reichert I, Figel P, Winchester L, «Orthodontic treatment of anterior open bite: a review article--is surgery always necessary?», in Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014».  Sep;18(3):271-7.
  6. Miamoto CB, Silva Marques L, Abreu LG, Paiva SM, «Impact of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite on children’s quality of life», in Dental Press J Orthod, 2018».  Jan-Feb; 23(1) 71–78.