Difference between revisions of "Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system - en"

Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system - en (view source)

Revision as of 11:03, 11 November 2022

129 bytes removed , 2 years ago

Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, founder, Interface administrators, member, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators, translator

11,564

edits

@@ Line 227: / Line 227: @@
   | LCCN =
   | OCLC =
-  }}</ref><ref>Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017.<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small> </ref> Precisely these 'Metacognitive Scaffolds' have allowed us to consider an important requirement in diagnostics that of 'basic knowledge' which tends to reduce the vagueness and ambiguity of the logic of medical language.<ref>Codish S, Shiffman RN, «'''A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations'''», in [[:Category:Citations from AMIA Annu Symp Proc|AMIA Annu Symp Proc]], 2005.<small>PMID:16779019</small></ref>
+  }}</ref><ref name=":0">Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017.<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small> </ref> Precisely these 'Metacognitive Scaffolds' have allowed us to consider an important requirement in diagnostics that of 'basic knowledge' which tends to reduce the vagueness and ambiguity of the logic of medical language.<ref>Codish S, Shiffman RN, «'''A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations'''», in [[:Category:Citations from AMIA Annu Symp Proc|AMIA Annu Symp Proc]], 2005.<small>PMID:16779019</small></ref>
 </blockquote>
 * '''Logic of medical language'''
 <blockquote>
-These premises<ref name=boonvan /><ref>Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small></ref> led us to the description of 'Fuzzy logic' models in which the 'Basic knowledge' is stratified at multiple levels of the context in multiple disciplines, increasing its capacity in differential diagnosis. All this is '''Logic of medical language'''<nowiki/>' with which we followed the diagnostic process of our poor patient 'Mary Poppins' who for 10 years hoped to be made a certain diagnosis despite the various attempts of clinical scientific propositions in the dental and neurological context:
+These premises<ref name=boonvan /><ref name=":0" /> led us to the description of 'Fuzzy logic' models in which the 'Basic knowledge' is stratified at multiple levels of the context in multiple disciplines, increasing its capacity in differential diagnosis. All this is '''Logic of medical language'''<nowiki/>' with which we followed the diagnostic process of our poor patient 'Mary Poppins' who for 10 years hoped to be made a certain diagnosis despite the various attempts of clinical scientific propositions in the dental and neurological context:
 '''Propositions in the Dental Context'''
@@ Line 360: / Line 360: @@
 ----
-In the end, after having somehow considered the axiomatic certainties and deterministic significances in a diagnostic context as critical (<math>P-value</math>), and having proposed a quantum probability model that in broad lines follows the path of the Bayes Theorem by adding an interference element (see [[Quantum-like modeling in biology with open quantum systems and instruments|Khrennikov]]) in the dedicated chapter, obviously <!-- and in a completely understandable and justifiable way --> a Hamletic doubt arises
+In the end, after having somehow considered the axiomatic certainties and deterministic significances in a diagnostic context as critical (<math>P-value</math>), and having proposed a quantum probability model that in broad lines follows the path of the Bayes Theorem by adding an interference element (see [[Quantum-like modeling in biology with open quantum systems and instruments|Khrennikov]]) in the dedicated chapter but obviously an Hamletic doubt arises:
 <center>
 {{q2|To be healthy or not to be healthy, that is the question|}}
@@ Line 383: / Line 383: @@
 The orthognathic, therefore, intrinsically has a critical limit: the cancellation of the neuromotor component, and still it must necessarily follow the anatomical and occlusal canons. The fact is that, frequently, the anatomical and neuromotor conditions coincide, returning a perfectly successful model from an aesthetic, functional and neuromuscular point of view; but sometimes the pre- and operative conditions prove unsuccessful in this aim.
-The occlusal position, and therefore the 'Centric Relationship'<ref>From which to start to finalize the patient orthodontically and prophetically</ref>, necessarily depend on the spatial position of the TMJ and of the mandible after surgical reduction. The finalization procedures, therefore, through anatomical maneuvers, such as the centric recordings, will necessarily return the spatial position appreciated in figure 15b.
+The occlusal position, and therefore the 'Centric Relationship',<ref>Adriaan J J Zonnenberg, Jens Christoph Türp, Charles S Greene.
+Centric relation critically revisited-What are the clinical implications? J Oral Rehabil. 2021 Sep;48(9):1050-1055. doi: 10.1111/joor.13215. Epub 2021 Jul 3.</ref> necessarily depend on the spatial position of the TMJ and of the mandible after surgical reduction. The finalization procedures, therefore, through anatomical maneuvers, such as the centric recordings, will necessarily return the spatial position appreciated in figure 15b.
 <center>