Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors
17,894
edits
Difference between revisions of "The logic of classical language -print"
The logic of classical language -print (view source)
Revision as of 13:26, 12 January 2023
, 2 years ago→Introduction
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ left|200px '''Classical logic''' will be discussed in this chapter. In the first part, mathematical formalism and the rules that compose it will be illustrated. In the second part, a clinical example will be given to evaluate its effectiveness in determining a diagnosis.<br>In conclusion, it is evident that a classical logic of language, which has an extremely dichotomous approach (either something is white, or it...") |
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
}}</ref><br>Obviously, this does not preclude the validity of the clinical history built on a pseudo-formal verbal language by now well rooted in the clinical reality and which has already proved its diagnostic authority. The attempt to shift attention to a machine language and to the System provides nothing but an opportunity for the validation of Diagnostic Medical Science. | }}</ref><br>Obviously, this does not preclude the validity of the clinical history built on a pseudo-formal verbal language by now well rooted in the clinical reality and which has already proved its diagnostic authority. The attempt to shift attention to a machine language and to the System provides nothing but an opportunity for the validation of Diagnostic Medical Science. | ||
We are definitely aware that our Linux Sapiens is still perplexed about what has been anticipated and continues to wonder{{q4|... | We are definitely aware that our Linux Sapiens is still perplexed about what has been anticipated and continues to wonder. | ||
{{q4|... but... could the logic of Classical Language help us to solve poor Mary Poppins' dilemma?|a little patience, please}} | |||
We cannot provide a conventional answer because science does not progress with assertions that are not justified by scientifically validated questions and reflections; and this is actually the reason why we will try to give voice to some thoughts, perplexities and doubts expressed on some basic topics brought into discussion in some scientific articles. | We cannot provide a conventional answer because science does not progress with assertions that are not justified by scientifically validated questions and reflections; and this is actually the reason why we will try to give voice to some thoughts, perplexities and doubts expressed on some basic topics brought into discussion in some scientific articles. | ||
| Line 251: | Line 253: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
In this review, arguments could not be missing on genetic, epigenetic and environmental influences during morphogenesis that lead to variations in the number, size and shape of the tooth<ref>{{Cite book | In this review, arguments could not be missing on genetic, epigenetic and environmental influences during morphogenesis that lead to variations in the number, size and shape of the tooth<ref> | ||
{{Cite book | |||
| autore = Brook AH | |||
| autore2 = Jernvall J | |||
| autore3 = Smith RN | |||
| autore4 = Hughes TE | |||
| autore5 = Townsend GC | |||
| titolo = The Dentition: The Outcomes of Morphogenesis Leading to Variations of Tooth Number, Size and Shape | |||
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12160 | |||
| volume = | | volume = | ||
| opera = Aust Dent J | | opera = Aust Dent J | ||
| Line 264: | Line 267: | ||
| editore = | | editore = | ||
| città = | | città = | ||
| PMID = | | PMID = | ||
| PMCID = | | PMCID = | ||
| Line 342: | Line 344: | ||
:"''The future is full of significant opportunities to improve the clinical outcomes of congenital and acquired craniofacial malformations. Clinicians play a key role as critical thinking and clinical audience substantially improve diagnostic accuracy and therefore clinical health outcomes''." | :"''The future is full of significant opportunities to improve the clinical outcomes of congenital and acquired craniofacial malformations. Clinicians play a key role as critical thinking and clinical audience substantially improve diagnostic accuracy and therefore clinical health outcomes''." | ||
{{q4| | {{q4|I understand the progress of Science described by the authors but I don't understand the change of thought|I'll give you a practical example}} | ||
In the chapter "[[Introduction]]" we posed certain questions on the subject of malocclusion but in this context we simulate the dentist's logic of medical language when faced with the clinical case presented in the "Introduction chapter" with its diagnostic and therapeutic conclusions. | In the chapter "[[Introduction]]" we posed certain questions on the subject of malocclusion but in this context we simulate the dentist's logic of medical language when faced with the clinical case presented in the "Introduction chapter" with its diagnostic and therapeutic conclusions. | ||
| Line 415: | Line 415: | ||
:At the time when orthodontic and orthognathics axioms were constructing protocols confirmed by the International Scientific Community, were they aware of the information we discussed in the introduction to this chapter? | :At the time when orthodontic and orthognathics axioms were constructing protocols confirmed by the International Scientific Community, were they aware of the information we discussed in the introduction to this chapter? | ||
Certainly not because time '''<math>t_n</math> is the bearer of information''' but despite this cognitive limit we proceed with a very questionable Classical Language Logic for the safety of the citizen.{{ | Certainly not because time '''<math>t_n</math> is the bearer of information''' but despite this cognitive limit we proceed with a very questionable Classical Language Logic for the safety of the citizen. | ||
{{q5|... this statement seems a bit risky!|sure, but the logical sequence has already been anticipated}} | |||
If the same case were interpreted with a mindset that followed a 'System's language logic' (it will be discussed in the appropriate chapter), the conclusions would be surprising. | If the same case were interpreted with a mindset that followed a 'System's language logic' (it will be discussed in the appropriate chapter), the conclusions would be surprising. | ||
If we observe the electrophysiological responses performed on the patient with malocclusion in figures 1b, 1c and 1d (with the explanation made directly in the caption to simplify the discussion), we shall notice that these data can make us think about anything except a 'Malocclusion' and, therefore, the axioms of type orthodontic and orthognathics 'cause/effect' leave a conceptual void.<gallery widths="350" heights="282" perrow="2" mode=" | If we observe the electrophysiological responses performed on the patient with malocclusion in figures 1b, 1c and 1d (with the explanation made directly in the caption to simplify the discussion), we shall notice that these data can make us think about anything except a 'Malocclusion' and, therefore, the axioms of type orthodontic and orthognathics 'cause/effect' leave a conceptual void. | ||
<gallery widths="350" heights="282" perrow="2" mode="packed"> | |||
File:Occlusal Centric view in open and cross bite patient.jpg|'''Figure 1a:''' Patient with malocclusion, open bite and right posterior crossbite who in rehabilitation terms must be treated with orthodontic therapy and / or orthognathic surgery | File:Occlusal Centric view in open and cross bite patient.jpg|'''Figure 1a:''' Patient with malocclusion, open bite and right posterior crossbite who in rehabilitation terms must be treated with orthodontic therapy and / or orthognathic surgery | ||
File:Bilateral Electric Transcranial Stimulation.jpg|'''<!--52-->Figure 1b:''' <!--53-->Motor evoked potential from electrical transcranial stimulation of the trigeminal roots.Note the structural symmetry calculated by the peak-to-peak amplitude on the left and right masseters (traces upper and lower respectively) | File:Bilateral Electric Transcranial Stimulation.jpg|'''<!--52-->Figure 1b:''' <!--53-->Motor evoked potential from electrical transcranial stimulation of the trigeminal roots.Note the structural symmetry calculated by the peak-to-peak amplitude on the left and right masseters (traces upper and lower respectively) | ||
| Line 426: | Line 429: | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
{{q4| | {{q4|Let me better understand what Classical Language Logic has to do with it|We will do it following the clinical case of our Mary Poppins}} | ||
==Mathematical formalism== | ==Mathematical formalism== | ||
| Line 549: | Line 552: | ||
}}</ref><center> | }}</ref><center> | ||
==2nd Clinical Approach== | ==2nd Clinical Approach== | ||
<gallery widths="350" heights="282" perrow="2" mode="packed"> | |||
<gallery widths="350" heights="282" perrow="2" mode=" | |||
File:Spasmo emimasticatorio.jpg|'''<!--107-->Figure 2:''' <!--108-->Patient reporting 'Orofacial Pain' in his right hemilateral face | File:Spasmo emimasticatorio.jpg|'''<!--107-->Figure 2:''' <!--108-->Patient reporting 'Orofacial Pain' in his right hemilateral face | ||
File:Spasmo emimasticatorio ATM.jpg|'''<!--109-->Figure 3:''' <!--110-->Patient's TMJ stratigraphy showing signs of condylar flattening and osteophyte | File:Spasmo emimasticatorio ATM.jpg|'''<!--109-->Figure 3:''' <!--110-->Patient's TMJ stratigraphy showing signs of condylar flattening and osteophyte | ||
| Line 746: | Line 747: | ||
This statement is so true that the <math>P-value</math> could be infinitely extended, widened enough to obtain an <math>\alpha=0</math> that corresponds to it in an infinite significance, as long as it remains limited in its context; yet, without meaning anything from a clinical point of view in other contexts, like in the neurologist one, for instance. | This statement is so true that the <math>P-value</math> could be infinitely extended, widened enough to obtain an <math>\alpha=0</math> that corresponds to it in an infinite significance, as long as it remains limited in its context; yet, without meaning anything from a clinical point of view in other contexts, like in the neurologist one, for instance. | ||
==Final considerations== | ==Final considerations== | ||
From a perspective of observation of this kind, the Logic of Predicates can only fortify the dentist’s reasoning and, at the same time, strengthen the <u>principle of the excluded third</u>: the principle is strengthened through the compatibility of the additional assertions <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math> which grant the dentist a complete coherence in the diagnosis and in confirming the sentence <math>\Im</math>: Poor Mary Poppins either has TMD, or she has not.{{q4|... | From a perspective of observation of this kind, the Logic of Predicates can only fortify the dentist’s reasoning and, at the same time, strengthen the <u>principle of the excluded third</u>: the principle is strengthened through the compatibility of the additional assertions <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math> which grant the dentist a complete coherence in the diagnosis and in confirming the sentence <math>\Im</math>: Poor Mary Poppins either has TMD, or she has not.{{q4|...and what if, with the advancement of research, new phenomena were discovered that would prove the neurologist right, instead of the dentist?|}} | ||
Basically, given the compatibility of the assertions <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math>, coherently saying that Orofacial Pain is caused by a Temporomandibular Disorders could become incompatible if another series of assertions <math>(\gamma_1,\gamma_2,.....\gamma_n \ )</math> were shown to be coherent: this would make a different sentence compatible <math>\Im</math>: could poor Mary Poppins suffer from Orofacial Pain from a neuromotor disorder (<sub>n</sub>OP) and not by a Temporomandibular Disorders? | Basically, given the compatibility of the assertions <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math>, coherently saying that Orofacial Pain is caused by a Temporomandibular Disorders could become incompatible if another series of assertions <math>(\gamma_1,\gamma_2,.....\gamma_n \ )</math> were shown to be coherent: this would make a different sentence compatible <math>\Im</math>: could poor Mary Poppins suffer from Orofacial Pain from a neuromotor disorder (<sub>n</sub>OP) and not by a Temporomandibular Disorders? | ||
| Line 770: | Line 772: | ||
In conclusion, it is evident that a classical logic of language, which has an extremely dichotomous approach (either it is white or it is black), cannot depict the many shades that occur in real clinical situations. | In conclusion, it is evident that a classical logic of language, which has an extremely dichotomous approach (either it is white or it is black), cannot depict the many shades that occur in real clinical situations. | ||
We need to find a more convenient and suitable language logic...{{q4|... | We need to find a more convenient and suitable language logic...{{q4|... can we then think of a Probabilistic Language Logic?|perhaps}} | ||
{{Bib}} | {{Bib}} | ||
<onlyinclude> | <onlyinclude> | ||
</onlyinclude> | </onlyinclude> | ||