Difference between revisions of "Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system"

Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system (view source)

Revision as of 13:30, 19 August 2022

44 bytes added , 2 years ago

Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors

17,894

edits

@@ Line 92: / Line 92: @@
 {{q2|Ephaptic trasmission |<small>we will discuss it extensively in the chapter 'Hemimasticatory Spasm'</small>}}
-But to the previous complexities of medical reality and difficulties of an ambiguous and vague logic of language are added problems related to the interpretation of the phenomena which is substantially dichotomous: a phenomenon that is physical, chemical or biological can be interpreted through a deterministic mindset exclusively cause / effect that falls into a classical probability or that prefers an exclusively probabilistic description of reality called quantum probability.
+Already serious complexities of medical reality and difficulties of an ambiguous and vague logic of language, are worsened by additional problems related to the peculiar  interpretation of the phenomena, an approach which is substantially dichotomous: a phenomenon that is physical, chemical or biological, can be interpreted through a deterministic mindset (a 'cause/effect only', one) which falls into a classical probability, or prefers an exclusively probabilistic description of the reality, called quantum probability.
-After these considerations, we have proposed the thought of the superposition of states of a system, starting a priori from the belief that an asymptomatic subject is simultaneously healthy and sick, until the 'Observable' is measured through an instrument. Leaving aside the various possible interpretations, the collapse of orthodox thought will be caused by its interaction with a macroscopic measuring object; that is when this 'Observable' is observed by the observer.
+After these considerations, we have proposed to think of a superposition of states in a system, starting a priori from the solid belief that an asymptomatic subject is simultaneously healthy and sick, until the 'Observable' is measured through an instrument. Leaving aside the various possible interpretations, the collapse of orthodox thought will be caused by its interaction with a macroscopic measuring object; that is when this 'Observable' is observed by the observer.
 We have therefore generated an 'Observable' (which includes the physical state of the system itself), an observer and a measuring instrument.