Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors
17,894
edits
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
| align="right" width="10%" |'''Normocclusion''' | | align="right" width="10%" |'''Normocclusion''' | ||
|}<center><gallery widths="350" heights="200" perrow="2" slideshow""=""> | |}<center><gallery widths="350" heights="200" perrow="2" slideshow""=""> | ||
File:Occlusal Centric view in open and cross bite patient.jpg|''' | File:Occlusal Centric view in open and cross bite patient.jpg|'''Figure 10a:''' Patient in '''entry''' in the Functional Neuro Gnathology department referred by colleagues for orthodontic and orthodontic treatment.<br>Orthodontically speaking, it would be irreverent not to consider the patient in a state of malocclusion. According to orthodontic canons, this is a case that has to be treated both orthodontically and surgically to restore a hypothetical 'Normocclusion';<br>yet, we will see that the reality is quite different | ||
File:Chirurgia Ortognatica 1.jpeg|'''Figure 10b:''' Patient in '''entry''' in the Functional Neuro Gnathology department, referred by colleagues for a prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles considered to be in a condition of 'normal occlusion' after having been surgically treated with a bimaxillary orthognathic intervention.<br>The patient, therefore, would find himself in a condition of 'Normocclusion;<br>yet, we will see in this case too that the reality is quite different. | File:Chirurgia Ortognatica 1.jpeg|'''Figure 10b:''' Patient in '''entry''' in the Functional Neuro Gnathology department, referred by colleagues for a prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles considered to be in a condition of 'normal occlusion' after having been surgically treated with a bimaxillary orthognathic intervention.<br>The patient, therefore, would find himself in a condition of 'Normocclusion;<br>yet, we will see in this case too that the reality is quite different. | ||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
<center><gallery widths="350" heights="200" perrow="2" slideshow""=""> | <center><gallery widths="350" heights="200" perrow="2" slideshow""=""> | ||
File:Bilateral Electric Transcranial Stimulation.jpg|''''Figure 11a''' Determination of the anatomical symmetry (structural or organic) of the patient's motor trigeminal nervous system in figure 1 with '''Malocclusion'''. The area of the graph (latency-amplitude) gives for the right side the value 13.15 mV / ms, for the left side a value of 13.60 mV / ms This indicates a symmetry difference of 0.8%. | File:Bilateral Electric Transcranial Stimulation.jpg|''''Figure 11a''' Determination of the anatomical symmetry (structural or organic) of the patient's motor trigeminal nervous system in figure 1 with '''Malocclusion'''. The area of the graph (latency-amplitude) gives for the right side the value 13.15 mV / ms, for the left side a value of 13.60 mV / ms This indicates a symmetry difference of 0.8%. | ||
File:Transcranial Stimulation 1.jpeg|''' | File:Transcranial Stimulation 1.jpeg|'''Figure 11b:''' Determination of the anatomical symmetry of the patient's nervous system "figure 1 malocclusion". The graph area (latency-amplitude) gives for the right side the value 9.7 mV / ms for the left side a value of 9.69 mV / ms. This indicates a symmetry of 0.1%. | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
<center><gallery widths="350" heights="200" perrow="3" slideshow""=""> | <center><gallery widths="350" heights="200" perrow="3" slideshow""=""> | ||
File:Jaw Jerk .jpg|''' | File:Jaw Jerk .jpg|'''Figure 12a:''' Determination of the functional component of the Central Nervous System. The results for patient 1 malocclusion show an area of 1.34 mV / ms and 1.46 mV / ms on the right and left masseter respectively. This shows a symmetry difference of 8.2%. | ||
File:Ortognatica Jaw jerk.jpeg|''' | File:Ortognatica Jaw jerk.jpeg|'''Figure 12b:''' Determination of the functional component of the Central Nervous System. Results for patient 2 (normocclusion) show an area of 1.37 mV / ms and 0.13 mV / ms on the right and left masseter, respectively. This shows a 90.5% symmetry difference. | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
<gallery widths="350" heights="200" perrow="2" slideshow""=""> | <gallery widths="350" heights="200" perrow="2" slideshow""=""> | ||
File:Mechanic Silent Period.jpg|'''Figure 13a:''' Execution of the Mechanical Silent Period showing perfect symmetry both in latency and duration as well as a well represented post-inhibition integral area. | File:Mechanic Silent Period.jpg|'''Figure 13a:''' Execution of the Mechanical Silent Period showing perfect symmetry both in latency and duration as well as a well represented post-inhibition integral area. | ||
File:Ortognatica Periodo silente.jpeg|''' | File:Ortognatica Periodo silente.jpeg|'''Figure 13b:''' Lack of the masseterine mechanical Silent Period on both sides which demonstrates the evident lack of motor neuron recruitment from occlusal instability. | ||
</gallery><gallery widths="350" heights="200" perrow="2" slideshow""=""> | </gallery><gallery widths="350" heights="200" perrow="2" slideshow""=""> | ||
File:Occlusal Centric view in open and cross bite patient.jpg|''' | File:Occlusal Centric view in open and cross bite patient.jpg|'''Figure 14a:''' Patient in '' 'exit' '' from the Functional Neuro Gnathology department with referencing of 'Occlusal dimorphism' and not of 'Malocclusion' | ||
File:Chirurgia Ortognatica 1.jpeg|''' | File:Chirurgia Ortognatica 1.jpeg|'''Figure 14b:''' Patient in '' 'exit' '' from the Functional Neuro Gnathology department with severe 'Malocclusion' report to be treated immediately. | ||
</gallery></center> | </gallery></center> | ||
edits