Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, founder, Interface administrators, member, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators, translator
11,564
edits
Difference between revisions of "Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system"
Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system (view source)
Revision as of 13:18, 13 September 2022
, 3 years agono edit summary
| Line 251: | Line 251: | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
Any colleague, even if of excellent clinical preparation in his own exclusive scientific dental context, would have had considerable difficulty in making a differential diagnosis between 'Temporomandibular Disorders' and 'Neuromotor Damage' without implementing his 'basic knowledge' on the exclusively neurophysiological phenomenon of [[Two Forms of Electrical Transmission Between Neurons|Synaptic trasmissione]] in the dedicated chapter. Here, in fact, the limits of the <math>P-value</math>, classical probability and Bayes statistical processes referring to specific contents of the discipline in question. | Any colleague, even if of excellent clinical preparation in his own exclusive scientific dental context, would have had considerable difficulty in making a differential diagnosis between 'Temporomandibular Disorders' and 'Neuromotor Damage' without implementing his 'basic knowledge' on the exclusively neurophysiological phenomenon of [[Two Forms of Electrical Transmission Between Neurons|Synaptic trasmissione]] in the dedicated chapter. Here, in fact, the limits of the <math>P-value</math>, classical probability and Bayes statistical processes referring to specific contents of the discipline in question.<blockquote> | ||
* The '''encrypted code''' sent out by the trigeminal system, the one to be decrypted, was: | * The '''encrypted code''' sent out by the trigeminal system, the one to be decrypted, was: | ||
| Line 261: | Line 260: | ||
After these considerations, we have proposed to think of a superposition of states in a system, starting a priori from the solid belief that an asymptomatic subject is simultaneously healthy and sick, until the 'Observable' is measured through an instrument. Leaving aside the various possible interpretations, the collapse of orthodox thought will be caused by its interaction with a macroscopic measuring object; that is when this 'Observable' is observed by the observer. | After these considerations, we have proposed to think of a superposition of states in a system, starting a priori from the solid belief that an asymptomatic subject is simultaneously healthy and sick, until the 'Observable' is measured through an instrument. Leaving aside the various possible interpretations, the collapse of orthodox thought will be caused by its interaction with a macroscopic measuring object; that is when this 'Observable' is observed by the observer. | ||
We have therefore generated an 'Observable' (which includes the physical state of the system itself), an observer and a measuring instrument. | We have therefore generated an 'Observable' (which includes the physical state of the system itself), an observer and a measuring instrument.</blockquote> | ||
==Introduction to quantum-like diagnostics== | ==Introduction to quantum-like diagnostics== | ||
| Line 291: | Line 290: | ||
{| width="80%" | | {| width="80%" | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| width="10%" |{{CD1}}entry:{{CD2}} | | width="10%" |{{CD1}}entry level:{{CD2}} | ||
| width="10%" |'''Malocclusion''' | | width="10%" |'''Malocclusion''' | ||
| align="right" width="10%" |'''Normocclusion''' | | align="right" width="10%" |'''Normocclusion''' | ||
| Line 335: | Line 334: | ||
{| width="80%" | | {| width="80%" | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| width="10%" |{{CD1}}exit:{{CD2}} | | width="10%" |{{CD1}}exit level:{{CD2}} | ||
| width="10%" |'''Normocclusion''' | | width="10%" |'''Normocclusion''' | ||
| align="right" width="10%" |'''Malocclusion''' | | align="right" width="10%" |'''Malocclusion''' | ||