Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors
9,617
edits
Difference between revisions of "Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system - en"
Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system - en (view source)
Revision as of 09:04, 21 October 2022
, 1 year ago→A coherent language
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{transl}} left|250px The model presented here above, of course, is remarkably complex because in this context only the conceptual procedure to follow has been presented: we will see later in the course of reading that everything will materialize in interesting modeling of the trigeminal electrophysiological responses from which a clinical mesoscopic model will be created, of which we can already anticipate the name: '''Index <math>\Psi</...") |
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
* '''Epistemology of knowledge''' | * '''Epistemology of knowledge''' | ||
<blockquote> | |||
Epistemology (from the Greek ἐπιστήμη, epistème, "certain knowledge" or "science", and λόγος, logos, "discourse") is that branch of philosophy that deals with the conditions under which scientific knowledge can be obtained and the methods to achieve such knowledge. The term specifically indicates that part of gnoseology that studies the foundations, validity and limits of scientific knowledge. | Epistemology (from the Greek ἐπιστήμη, epistème, "certain knowledge" or "science", and λόγος, logos, "discourse") is that branch of philosophy that deals with the conditions under which scientific knowledge can be obtained and the methods to achieve such knowledge. The term specifically indicates that part of gnoseology that studies the foundations, validity and limits of scientific knowledge. | ||
| Line 206: | Line 207: | ||
| OCLC = | | OCLC = | ||
}}</ref> and all that is <nowiki>'</nowiki>'''Epistomology'''<nowiki>'</nowiki>, that almost spontaneously highlighted another fundamental passage that of 'Interdisciplinarity', a phenomenon that only with great effort is recognized as important as the specialized disciplines. | }}</ref> and all that is <nowiki>'</nowiki>'''Epistomology'''<nowiki>'</nowiki>, that almost spontaneously highlighted another fundamental passage that of 'Interdisciplinarity', a phenomenon that only with great effort is recognized as important as the specialized disciplines. | ||
</blockquote> | |||
* '''Interdisciplinarity''' | * '''Interdisciplinarity''' | ||
<blockquote> | |||
The proposed alternative philosophical paradigm, called the "Engineering Paradigm of Science" implies alternative philosophical assumptions regarding aspects such as the purpose of science, the character of knowledge, the epistemic and pragmatic criteria for the acceptance of knowledge and the role of technological tools. Consequently, scientific researchers need so-called metacognitive scaffolds to aid in the analysis and reconstruction of how "knowledge" is constructed in different disciplines. <ref>Boon M, Van Baalen S, «'''Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Eur J Philos Sci|Eur J Philos Sci]], 2019. <small>DOI:10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4</small> </ref><ref>Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017.<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small> </ref> Precisely these 'Metacognitive Scaffolds' have allowed us to consider an important requirement in diagnostics that of 'basic knowledge' which tends to reduce the vagueness and ambiguity of the logic of medical language.<ref>Codish S, Shiffman RN, «'''A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations'''», in [[:Category:Citations from AMIA Annu Symp Proc|AMIA Annu Symp Proc]], 2005.<small>PMID:16779019</small></ref> | The proposed alternative philosophical paradigm, called the "Engineering Paradigm of Science" implies alternative philosophical assumptions regarding aspects such as the purpose of science, the character of knowledge, the epistemic and pragmatic criteria for the acceptance of knowledge and the role of technological tools. Consequently, scientific researchers need so-called metacognitive scaffolds to aid in the analysis and reconstruction of how "knowledge" is constructed in different disciplines. <ref>Boon M, Van Baalen S, «'''Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Eur J Philos Sci|Eur J Philos Sci]], 2019. <small>DOI:10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4</small> </ref><ref>Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017.<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small> </ref> Precisely these 'Metacognitive Scaffolds' have allowed us to consider an important requirement in diagnostics that of 'basic knowledge' which tends to reduce the vagueness and ambiguity of the logic of medical language.<ref>Codish S, Shiffman RN, «'''A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations'''», in [[:Category:Citations from AMIA Annu Symp Proc|AMIA Annu Symp Proc]], 2005.<small>PMID:16779019</small></ref> | ||
<blockquote> | |||
* '''Logic of medical language''' | * '''Logic of medical language''' | ||
</blockquote> | |||
These premises <ref>Boon M, Van Baalen S, «'''Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Eur J Philos Sci|Eur J Philos Sci]], 2019<small>DOI:10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4</small> </ref> <ref>Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small></ref> led us to the description of 'Fuzzy logic' models in which the 'Basic knowledge' is stratified at multiple levels of the context in multiple disciplines, increasing its capacity in differential diagnosis. All this is '''Logic of medical language'''<nowiki/>' with which we followed the diagnostic process of our poor patient 'Mary Poppins' who for 10 years hoped to be made a certain diagnosis despite the various attempts of clinical scientific propositions in the dental and neurological context: | These premises <ref>Boon M, Van Baalen S, «'''Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Eur J Philos Sci|Eur J Philos Sci]], 2019<small>DOI:10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4</small> </ref> <ref>Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small></ref> led us to the description of 'Fuzzy logic' models in which the 'Basic knowledge' is stratified at multiple levels of the context in multiple disciplines, increasing its capacity in differential diagnosis. All this is '''Logic of medical language'''<nowiki/>' with which we followed the diagnostic process of our poor patient 'Mary Poppins' who for 10 years hoped to be made a certain diagnosis despite the various attempts of clinical scientific propositions in the dental and neurological context: | ||
| Line 228: | Line 233: | ||
<math>{\displaystyle \gamma _{3}}=</math> CT right masseter muscle in Figure 8<center> | <math>{\displaystyle \gamma _{3}}=</math> CT right masseter muscle in Figure 8<center> | ||
===Propositions in the Dental Context=== | ===Propositions in the Dental Context=== | ||
<gallery widths="350" heights="200" perrow="4" slideshow""=""> | <gallery widths="350" heights="200" perrow="4" slideshow""=""> | ||
| Line 260: | Line 266: | ||
We have therefore generated an 'Observable' (which includes the physical state of the system itself), an observer and a measuring instrument. | We have therefore generated an 'Observable' (which includes the physical state of the system itself), an observer and a measuring instrument. | ||
==Introduction to quantum-like diagnostics== | ==Introduction to quantum-like diagnostics== | ||