Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors
9,617
edits
Difference between revisions of "Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system - en"
Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system - en (view source)
Revision as of 09:04, 21 October 2022
, 1 year ago→A coherent language
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 211: | Line 211: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
The proposed alternative philosophical paradigm, called the "Engineering Paradigm of Science" implies alternative philosophical assumptions regarding aspects such as the purpose of science, the character of knowledge, the epistemic and pragmatic criteria for the acceptance of knowledge and the role of technological tools. Consequently, scientific researchers need so-called metacognitive scaffolds to aid in the analysis and reconstruction of how "knowledge" is constructed in different disciplines. <ref>Boon M, Van Baalen S, «'''Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Eur J Philos Sci|Eur J Philos Sci]], 2019. <small>DOI:10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4</small> </ref><ref>Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017.<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small> </ref> Precisely these 'Metacognitive Scaffolds' have allowed us to consider an important requirement in diagnostics that of 'basic knowledge' which tends to reduce the vagueness and ambiguity of the logic of medical language.<ref>Codish S, Shiffman RN, «'''A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations'''», in [[:Category:Citations from AMIA Annu Symp Proc|AMIA Annu Symp Proc]], 2005.<small>PMID:16779019</small></ref> | The proposed alternative philosophical paradigm, called the "Engineering Paradigm of Science" implies alternative philosophical assumptions regarding aspects such as the purpose of science, the character of knowledge, the epistemic and pragmatic criteria for the acceptance of knowledge and the role of technological tools. Consequently, scientific researchers need so-called metacognitive scaffolds to aid in the analysis and reconstruction of how "knowledge" is constructed in different disciplines. <ref>Boon M, Van Baalen S, «'''Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Eur J Philos Sci|Eur J Philos Sci]], 2019. <small>DOI:10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4</small> </ref><ref>Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017.<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small> </ref> Precisely these 'Metacognitive Scaffolds' have allowed us to consider an important requirement in diagnostics that of 'basic knowledge' which tends to reduce the vagueness and ambiguity of the logic of medical language.<ref>Codish S, Shiffman RN, «'''A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations'''», in [[:Category:Citations from AMIA Annu Symp Proc|AMIA Annu Symp Proc]], 2005.<small>PMID:16779019</small></ref> | ||
</blockquote> | |||
* '''Logic of medical language''' | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
These premises <ref>Boon M, Van Baalen S, «'''Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Eur J Philos Sci|Eur J Philos Sci]], 2019<small>DOI:10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4</small> </ref> <ref>Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small></ref> led us to the description of 'Fuzzy logic' models in which the 'Basic knowledge' is stratified at multiple levels of the context in multiple disciplines, increasing its capacity in differential diagnosis. All this is '''Logic of medical language'''<nowiki/>' with which we followed the diagnostic process of our poor patient 'Mary Poppins' who for 10 years hoped to be made a certain diagnosis despite the various attempts of clinical scientific propositions in the dental and neurological context: | These premises <ref>Boon M, Van Baalen S, «'''Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Eur J Philos Sci|Eur J Philos Sci]], 2019<small>DOI:10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4</small> </ref> <ref>Boon M, «'''An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool'''», in [[:Category:Citations from Prog Biophys Mol Biol|Prog Biophys Mol Biol]], 2017<small>DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.001</small></ref> led us to the description of 'Fuzzy logic' models in which the 'Basic knowledge' is stratified at multiple levels of the context in multiple disciplines, increasing its capacity in differential diagnosis. All this is '''Logic of medical language'''<nowiki/>' with which we followed the diagnostic process of our poor patient 'Mary Poppins' who for 10 years hoped to be made a certain diagnosis despite the various attempts of clinical scientific propositions in the dental and neurological context: | ||