Difference between revisions of "Conclusions on the status quo in the logic of medical language regarding the masticatory system"

File:Spasmo emimasticatorio ATM.jpg|'''Figure 2:'''  <math>\delta_1=</math> Patient's TMJ Stratigraphy showing signs of condylar flattening and osteophyte

File:Atm1 sclerodermia.jpg|'''Figure 3:''' <math>\delta_1=</math> Computed Tomography of the TMJ

File:EMG2.jpg|'''Figure 5:''' <math>\delta_2=</math> EMG Interferential Pattern. Overlapping upper traces corresponding to the right masseter, lower to the left masseter.  

File:Spasmo emimasticatorio JJ.jpg|'''Figure 6:''' <math>{\gamma _{1}}=</math> Jaw jerk electrophysiologically detected on the right (upper traces) and left (lower traces) masseters

File:Spasmo emimasticatorio SP.jpg|'''Figure 7:''' <math>\gamma _2=</math> Mechanical silent period detected electrophysiologically on the right (upper overlapping traces) and left (lower overlapping traces) masseters

File:Spasmo emimasticatorio TC.jpg|''' Figure 8:''' <math>\gamma _3=</math> CT shows evident hypertrophy of the right masseter

File:Spasmo emimasticatorio.jpg|'''Figura 9:''' Patient in '''leaving''' from the Functional Neuro Gnathology Department after 1 week with differential diagnosis of 'Hemimasticatory Spasm'

File:Occlusal Centric view in open and cross bite patient.jpg|'''Figura 10a:''' Patient in '''entry''' in the Functional Neuro Gnathology department referred by colleagues for orthodontic and orthodontic treatment. It would be, orthodontically speaking, irreverent not to consider the patient in a state of malocclusion. According to orthodontic canons, this is a case to be treated both orthodontically and surgically to restore a hypothetical 'Normocclusion' but we will see that the reality is quite different

File:Bilateral Electric Transcranial Stimulation.jpg|''''Figure 11a'''  Determination of the anatomical symmetry (structural or organic) of the patient's motor trigeminal nervous system in figure 1 with '''Malocclusion'''. The area of the graph (latency-amplitude) gives for the right side the value 13.15 mV / ms, for the left side a value of 13.60 mV / ms This indicates a symmetry difference of 0.8%.

File:Transcranial Stimulation 1.jpg|'''Figura 11b:''' Determination of the anatomical symmetry of the patient's nervous system "figure 1 malocclusion". The graph area (latency-amplitude) gives for the right side the value 9.7 mV / ms for the left side a value of 9.69 mV / ms. This indicates a symmetry of 0.1%.

File:Jaw Jerk .jpg|'''Figura 12a:''' Determination of the functional component of the Central Nervous System. The results for patient 1 malocclusion show an area of 1.34 mV / ms and 1.46 mV / ms on the right and left masseter respectively. This shows a symmetry difference of 8.2%.

File:Ortognatica Jaw jerk.jpg|'''Figura 12b:''' Determination of the functional component of the Central Nervous System. Results for patient 2 (normocclusion) show an area of 1.37 mV / ms and 0.13 mV / ms on the right and left masseter, respectively. This shows a 90.5% symmetry difference.

File:Mechanic Silent Period.jpg|'''Figure 13a:''' Execution of the Mechanical Silent Period showing perfect symmetry both in latency and duration as well as a well represented post-inhibition integral area.

File:Ortognatica Periodo silente.jpg|'''Figura 13b:''' Lack of the masseterine mechanical Silent Period on both sides which demonstrates the evident lack of motor neuron recruitment from occlusal instability.

File:Occlusal Centric view in open and cross bite patient.jpg|'''Figura 14a:''' Patient in '' 'exit' '' from the Functional Neuro Gnathology department with referencing of 'Occlusal dimorphism' and not of 'Malocclusion'